In a recent High Court decision — Kobus Van der Westhuizen N.O. & Another v Master of the High Court, Mahikeng & Others (27 March 2026) — the Court addressed two questions that affects many business owners:
1) Can members of a close corporation be held personally liable for liquidation costs?2) Must the Master still charge fees if the estate has no assets?
This judgment provides critical clarity for business owners, creditors, and insolvency practitioners across South Africa.
The matter concerned the voluntary winding-up of a close corporation, where the appointed liquidators sought direction from the Court regarding:
The Master of the High Court took the position that members should contribute to costs, and fees were still payable. The Court ultimately disagreed.
The Court made it clear that being a member of a close corporation does NOT automatically make you liable for liquidation costs.
Liability only arises if you contractually agreed to be liable (e.g. in founding documents), or when a specific legal provisions apply, such as:
Reckless or fraudulent trading
Personal guaranteesStatutory breaches
Simply holding membership in a close corporation does not expose you to personal financial liability for liquidation expenses.
The Court rejected the argument that insolvency provisions automatically apply to members. Insolvency laws (such as section 106 of the Insolvency Act) only regulate existing liability — they do not create it. Important Principle: Legal liability must already exist before insolvency provisions can be enforced.
This is where the judgment becomes particularly practical. The Court held that if an estate has no assets, or assets below R5,000 - then no Master’s fee is payable, because the applicable tariff only applies once the threshold of R5,000 is exceeded.
The Court confirmed that:
For Business Owners (Close Corporations) - You are protected from automatic personal liability, but you may still be exposed if you signed surety, or acted recklessly, or you agreed to indemnify the close corporation.
For Creditors recovery in asset-less estates remains limited, even administrative costs may not even be recoverable.
For Insolvency Practitioners this judgment limits recovery strategies against members and reinforces strict statutory interpretation.
This case is significant because it protects business owners from unjustified liability and clarifies the limits of Insolvency Law, while it also prevents unnecessary administrative costs in empty estates and provides legal certainty in close corporation liquidations.
Insolvency Law is highly technical — and small misunderstandings can have major financial consequences. At Grobler Malope Inc, we specialise in:
Whether you are a business owner, creditor, or trustee, we ensure your position is legally protected and strategically managed. Grobler Malope Inc
When results matter...® 🌐 www.gmilaw.co.za
📍 Rustenburg | Nationwide Assistance
Copyright © 2026 Rohan Lamprecht. Disclaimer: The information in this article is of a general nature for educational purposes only, relevant to the publishing date. Any opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of Grobler Malope Inc. The content is not intended to constitute professional or legal advice, and you are encouraged to call and consult with our attorneys to discuss your specific situation before making any decisions. Grobler Malope Inc - 087 057 1790 - info@gmilaw.co.za